Seems like one of the places bots have turned up recently was in the 30/60 limit games at Ultimate Bet, where as many as 50 different bots, likely under the controls of juts one or two real-life thiefs, may have worked over the limit hold'em games centering on the 30/60 level. The poker forum at the European site stoxpoker.com has a full unfolding of the table, including the fact that the suspect accounts have all disappeared --- or been removed --- in the last week. The accounts were identified by an astute player using Poker Tracker who noticed that a large number of his opponents exhibited not only the same patterns and strategies of play, when compiled in a statistical manner, but did some things in a repeated manner that no human players would do. Check this link and read for yourself --- it's an interesting tale.
Okay, it happened before the UIGEA was signed, but why let little things like the flow of time ruin a good lead-in? Besides, it doesn't change the fact that at least in this one instance, UB seems ripe for bot plundering. Given that these and other bot groups have been identified through post-play PokerTracker analysis, why is it that the sites themselves aren't running a corporate-sized version of PokerTracker or an equivalent, looking for the same sort of play-pattern clustering that helped identify these bots to one of the victimized players?
It's certainly doable, and any responsible site should be checking for strategic clustering of this sort. I suspect that Poker Stars already does this, and perhaps some other sites do as well, but in this day and age of electronic mnipultion it should be a mandatory part of what any operator does to provide a fair and responsible poker site.
No comments:
Post a Comment