
Well, anyhow, here's what this second provision offers:
13.1 (2) No person shall enter into a sponsorship relationship with an internet gaming business that is operated contrary to the Criminal Code (Canada).
There wasn't any room in my pokernews.com piece to go off on tangents, pontificating about the effects of that second provision; I mentioned it but lightly, then let it go. But let's think about it here, for a second. Two of the very biggest names in tournament and cash-game poker are Ontario-born, those being Daniel Negreanu (Thunder Bay), and Gavin Smith (Guelph, near Toronto). No doubt there are countless more, but this is just top-of-the-head stuff. Now, remember that Negreanu is the big-name force behind Full Contact Poker, and Smith has some celebrity deals as well; I believe he's one of the "friends of Full Tilt," among other things.
Are these guys on the edge of being legislated into illegality? I don't know the current status of Negreanu's citizenship, since he lives in Vegas these days, but what surprised me is the fact that it hadn't been picked up at all in other poker outlets. Negreanu is one of the game's brightest and most personable faces, and what happens to him or about him is very important to poker as a whole.
It's not about shining light on Negreanu; the kliegs are already on him, all the time. Rather, it's about the rest of us recognizing these outside threats for what they are.
In any event, I'd wager that Negreanu and Full Contact Poker are feeling a bit besieged these days. Not only is there this matter, but FCP is one of those Ongame/Pokerroom skins, and FCP is searching for a new software provider and/or network as it attempts to transition away from the no-U.S. stance of Ongame. FCP announced just yesterday that there might be a short-term suspension of its services to U.S. players on November 5 as it struggles to put an alternate solution into place.
No comments:
Post a Comment